<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New 3.06Ghz iMac : slower than the old model!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mhackintosh.com/2009/10/new-3-06ghz-imac-slower-than-the-old-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mhackintosh.com/2009/10/new-3-06ghz-imac-slower-than-the-old-model/</link>
	<description>My life as an hackintosh owner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 01:04:27 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Why MacWorld doesn&#8217;t Benchmark the new iMac &#124; Mhackintosh blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.mhackintosh.com/2009/10/new-3-06ghz-imac-slower-than-the-old-model/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Why MacWorld doesn&#8217;t Benchmark the new iMac &#124; Mhackintosh blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mhackintosh.com/?p=122#comment-551</guid>
		<description>[...] and used since more than one week even on foreign countries. So they are here, for real. And as I benchmarked the new Imac quickly using XBench, their performance-level is deceiving and results seems [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and used since more than one week even on foreign countries. So they are here, for real. And as I benchmarked the new Imac quickly using XBench, their performance-level is deceiving and results seems [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
