<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mhackintosh blog &#187; iMac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mhackintosh.com/tag/imac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mhackintosh.com</link>
	<description>My life as an hackintosh owner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:58:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>All Core2 Duo iMac sport a GeForce 9400M!</title>
		<link>http://blog.mhackintosh.com/2010/02/all-core2-duo-imac-sport-a-geforce-9400m/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mhackintosh.com/2010/02/all-core2-duo-imac-sport-a-geforce-9400m/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iAPX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeForce 9400M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iMac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCP79]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mhackintosh.com/?p=303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I discovered that looking at iMac 21.5&#8243; and 27&#8243; with Core2 Duo 3.06Ghz, both equipped theorically with Radeon 4670HD, without another GPU or OpenCL processor&#8230;
In fact, they both use nVidia&#8217;s MCP79 chipset, that is described like that:
The MCP79 chipset is a single-chip solution for small form factor notebooks. There are six versions of the MCP79. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I discovered that looking at iMac 21.5&#8243; and 27&#8243; with Core2 Duo 3.06Ghz, both equipped theorically with Radeon 4670HD, without another GPU or OpenCL processor&#8230;</p>
<p>In fact, they both use <a href="http://www.techfuzz.com/roadmaps/2008.aspx">nVidia&#8217;s MCP79 chipset</a>, that is described like that:</p>
<blockquote><p>The MCP79 chipset is a single-chip solution for small form factor notebooks. There are six versions of the MCP79. All the versions include a DirectX 10 GeForce graphics core which supports Shader Model 4.0, NVIDIA&#8217;s VP3 video processor, Hybrid Power, Hybrid SLI, and Hybrid Performance.</p></blockquote>
<p>All versions of MCP79 includes a DirectX 10 GeForce graphics core (GeForce 9400M or GeForce 9300M). So this is disabled by Mac OS X on the new iMac instead of using it for OpenCL, as GeForce 9400M is far faster in real-world OpenCL processing than Radeon 4670HD due to it&#8217;s archiecture (tehnically: support of unified read-write in GPU SM shared-memory).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand why Apple is using a chipset that is great for OpenCL processing, with peak performance-level of 40 Gflops (Core2 Duo 3.06Ghz peak performance is 24.28 GFlops, 3.33Ghz version reach 26.64), and enable good use of OpenCL, aggregating the computing power of CPU + GPU to sometimes double the performance-level of CPU-alone.</p>
<p>This is truly disturbing, as the same chipset stay with GeForce 9400M active on a MacBook Pro when display is handled by GeForce 9600M GT, and both GPU are used by OpenCL!</p>
<p>Why Apple act so strangely with it&#8217;s hardware, paying for it, putting it on the computer, making the consumer pay for it finally&#8230; And disabling it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mhackintosh.com/2010/02/all-core2-duo-imac-sport-a-geforce-9400m/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Late&#8217;09 iMac benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://blog.mhackintosh.com/2009/11/late09-imac-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.mhackintosh.com/2009/11/late09-imac-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iAPX</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[21.5inch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[27inch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iMac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenCL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mhackintosh.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally, MacWorld changed it&#8217;s benchmark suite, to focalise on CPU more than other parts of what makes a great computer: balance between CPU, GPU, Memory and Hard-drive!
Anyway, what is really interesting is that old 3.06Ghz iMac is faster than new 3.06Ghz iMac on MacWorld&#8217;s new SpeedMark 6 suite. So the refurbished iMac 24&#8243; 3.06Ghz is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, MacWorld changed it&#8217;s benchmark suite, to focalise on CPU more than other parts of what makes a great computer: balance between CPU, GPU, Memory and Hard-drive!</p>
<p>Anyway, what is really interesting is that <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/143636/2009/11/imacs_late2009_benchmarks.html?lsrc=top_1">old 3.06Ghz iMac is faster than new 3.06Ghz iMac on MacWorld&#8217;s new SpeedMark 6</a> suite. So the refurbished iMac 24&#8243; 3.06Ghz is a real bargain <img src='http://blog.mhackintosh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And for performance/price balance, the new entry-level 21.5&#8243; Cor2 Duo 2&#215;3.06Ghz equipped with GeForce 9400M seems to be unbeatable, and probably the most interesting model of the new line, except the 27&#8243; Core i5 for power hungry <img src='http://blog.mhackintosh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>On OpenCL benchmarks that will rely on real-world OpenCL or CUDA ported applications, I wonder that old-generation equipped with GT130 or GeForce 8800 will easily beat Radeon 4670 or even 4850 cards, even if they are slower on pure games!</p>
<p>Alas, no USB 3.0, no eSATA, no SSD, no Firewire 3200 &#8230;</p>
<p>Wanna copy files from 1 external hard-drive to another? 45MB/s speed limit, my MacBook Pro with it&#8217;s eSATA ExpressCard is between 80MB/s and 90MB/s, 2X faster!</p>
<p>Please Apple, put an ExpressCard/34 slot into your next-generation iMac for us to be able to upgrade to eSATA, USB 3.0, 2 Firewire 800 ports, FireWire 3200, &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.mhackintosh.com/2009/11/late09-imac-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
